Of Bunnies And Men

In my tween years, which was before the term “tween” had massacred our glorious English language, I read a book by one of my favorite authors, Gary Paulson. It was entitled The Boy Who Owned The School, and it detailed the life of teenager Jacob Freisten as he simpered and wussed his way through the halls of his high school. The only remarkable thing about this boy was his complete unremarkability. Not only was he not smart, good-looking, athletic, or possessing of a great personality, he didn’t even desire any of those attributes. He slid through the school unnoticed by anyone, particularly by his secret crush: Maria Tresser.
Maria was that girl everyone knew in school: beautiful, smart, good at everything, pursued by everyone, and topped off with a wonderful personality. She wasn’t just out of Jacob’s league, she was out of his species. He doesn’t even attempt to pursue her.

Through a series of events usually brought on by Jacob’s many failures, Maria finds out the boy is obsessed with her, and agrees to date him. She does this despite Jacob’s total lack of any redeeming qualities, because in her words, he’s a “winner.” While Jacob is not a bad person in any way, the story grinds my gears.

This is a storyline I see repeated in popular culture; Girl has or is pursued by a successful dude, but she ends up with an awkward guy with no skills or masculine traits, just because he desires her. He’s cute, but not the kind of cute associated with Brad Pitt or Charles Bronson. It’s the “cute” associated with puppies, kittens, or bunnies.

I call this “Baby Bunny Syndrome.”

  
It happens when a girl looks at a guy and says to herself, “Awwww…” like she’s looking at a baby bunny. This type of guy portrayed in pop culture is essentially useless, non-threatening, and soft. Seems harsh, doesn’t it? Consider the “hero” of the following movies;

“She’s Out Of Your League”

“Encino Man”

“Win A Date With Tad Hamilton”

“Hot Rod”

“Take Me Home Tonight”

“Scott Pilgrim Vs The World”

“Zombieland”

“Any Movie That Has Topher Grace In The Cast”

  
“Gross…oh wait, that’s me…”

A desirable girl throws away a chance with a successful businessman, actor, or in one case, a freaking fighter pilot, just to end up with a boy whose only positive trait is that he has a crush on the girl. The assumption is that all successful men are knuckle-dragging Philistines around women.

At least in “Revenge of the Nerds” they were geniuses.

I see real life examples of this in today’s young males. They realize that men in the past have sometimes done evil to women, but they resolve to fix this my chopping off their own wedding tackle. They make themselves as emasculated as possible, and void their lives of evil things like ambition, self-respect, and strength. They mope around, asking why girls don’t like them, but never do anything to better their chances. You know, the guys who think they can get a woman to like them by making her feel sorry for them.

“Somehow, she’ll see SOMETHING in me, she’ll see through the awkwardness and notice something different about me as I spend my life watching her in silence.”

I got news for you, Awkward Man; you have nothing to offer her. When given the choice between two guys, all other things being equal, a woman of average intelligence will choose the man who has confidence and success. She would be smart if she did, not judgmental or shallow. The other guy will either be stuck in the friend zone as a pet of sorts, or end up with a woman attracted to guys she feels sorry for. That kind of woman is just as much bad news as the guy.

My wife and I have spent the past ten years of our marriage watching the show “Friends.” While the previously mentioned movies portray the relationships as ideal and ending happily, “Friends” shows you the logical conclusion.

  
Think of all that backwash…

The character Monica (an above average-looking shrew in my opinion) has a choice between two men; Richard and Chandler. Let’s look at their stats, shall we?
Richard
  

Pro’s

-Successful eye doctor

-Masculine

-Romantic

-Wealthy

-Confident

-Generous and kind

-Monogomous

-Respected by everyone

-Mature

-Tom Freaking Selleck
Con’s

-Didn’t want kids, though this changes


Chandler
  

Pro’s

-Funny

-Wants kids

-Cute like a bunny (He literally puts on a bunny suit in one episode)
Con’s

-Effeminate

-Hates his crummy job

-Lacks self respect

-Terrified of commitment

-Immature

-Promiscuous

-Never on Magnum P.I.
In the end, Monica chooses Chandler to marry. I get it. She couldn’t end up with Richard because he’s perfect, and perfect relationships make for bad TV. The viewer is then able to see what happens when a woman chooses a Chandler over a Richard. She bosses him around, constantly disrespects him, and is even lightly (but consistently) mocked by her own friends for choosing him. Why would she respect him, when she seemed to pick him so that she wouldn’t have to? What we are left with is a slightly funnier version of Jon and Kate Gosselin.

  
“Nope. Just…just no.”

Now, do you have to be successful and rich to be worthy of a good woman? Obviously not. However, each man has to ask himself what it is that he has to offer the woman of his dreams? She can’t read your mind and see how awesome you are, especially if all you do is mope around and make Facebook posts about how sad you are. Give her something to admire!

Here’s the takeaway. A man who seeks to be in a relationship with the woman of his dreams should work to be the kind of man she can be in awe of, not say “Awwww…” to. I personally strive to be Tom Selleck in all ways.

Advertisements

6 Comments Add yours

  1. abloggerkid says:

    Hey, can I have your email? Honestly I just get too engrossed in your blogs and would love to have further correspondence other than in the comments. 😊😊😊

    And yes. There’s something of a story I read that reminded me of this very blog as it propagated this very idea of manliness that you’ve so masterfully written about. It’s an Indian author. Rabindranath Tagore

    Like

  2. abloggerkid says:

    He was the first non European Nobel laureate (in literature).

    Like

    1. abloggerkid says:

      The story’s titled “The Lost Jewels”.

      Written in 1898.

      Actually he wrote it in bengali, but I’ve read the English version. Its poorly translated in English and the writing style isn’t very great, but the story carries some raw ideas and has good potential for some mainstream flick.

      Like

      1. I get a lot of my ideas of masculinity from both the Bible and an author named Jack Donovan. I’ll definitely look up your guy too. Are you on Facebook?

        Like

      2. abloggerkid says:

        Yeah I’ve heard of Donovan but not read his book, but one of my favourite quotes is

        “Being good at being a man isn’t a quest for moral perfection, it’s about fighting to survive. Good men admire or respect bad men when they demonstrate strength, courage, mastery or a commitment to the men of their own renegade tribes. A concern with being good at being a man is what good guys and bad guys have in common.” – Jack Donovan

        Liked by 1 person

  3. abloggerkid says:

    And yes I’m on Facebook.
    Name’s Yusuf Jawaid
    Profile picture is the same as my WordPress gravatar. 😊

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s